With the conclusion to the Chris Dorner incident, I’m wondering if any further inquisitions will be made. I read Dorner’s manifesto and IMO is he crazy? Yes (and no). But he’s definitely not a dummy in some sense. I’m not condoning his action but wouldn’t you think it’s worth looking into his motives. Dorner wrote an intensive manifesto justifying his action as a “necessary evil”; he criticizes the chain of command for their incompetents and apathy for justices. He’s accused a lot of people of wrong doing and believes certain measures needed to be taken. But did it make a difference (or will it make a difference)?
hannlimblog 